When we seek to compare the Holocaust with other events in which mass atrocity crimes (genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes) were committed, we engage with comparative approaches. When we strive to shed light on aspects that intersect or parallel one another, our choice of terms can communicate respect and bring clarity, or they can offend and distort. In comparative approaches, we strive neither to obscure the distinct features of the Holocaust nor different mass atrocity crimes. We can demonstrate contrasts between events.
The questions for reflection that follow can help policymakers, educators, museums, memorial organizations, and journalists within IHRA Member Countries and beyond adopt good practice and make responsible choices in terminology related to comparisons between the Holocaust and other mass atrocities.1
The questions are organized into three categories: new practices in Holocaust comparison, new popularization of terms, and new audiences.
